In 2020, as the world was gripped by the coronavirus, the killing of George Floyd shocked Americans into action and into the streets by the millions, protesting the unrelenting killing of Black people by police. 

The moment sparked a nascent reckoning in America around systemic racism and institutional inequality — in many cases, with Black women at the center. They led  protests and were hired to fix broken institutions and diversify boards. They also did the emotional labor of educating their friends and neighbors. Already the backbone of our democracy, many were called on to also be a bridge to racial healing.

Then, it seemed like the country was ready to listen, understand and move toward a freer, fairer, more equal democracy. Five years later, many of these same Black women find themselves at the center of a backlash, confronted with attacks on the diversity, equity and inclusion efforts that were previously championed. 

As I reflected on the five-year anniversary of the start of the reckoning, I thought about the Black women who were on the frontlines — in the streets and workplace, from the boardroom to the classroom. At this milestone, I wanted to hear from them about what this moment had cost them, then and now.

I reached out to several Black women I talk to often with a single question: “Five years after the racial reckoning of 2020, what did that moment ask of you — and what, if anything, did it give back?” Their answers, in their own words (with some editing for length and clarity), were insightful and honest. 

Nikole Hannah-Jones, staff writer, The New York Times Magazine

The so-called racial reckoning of 2020 asked me to do all that I could, with the platform I had, to use that moment to push us past the superficial to a deeper historical understanding of what spawned the reckoning and the scale of the debt that justice required. Those of us who are students of history, who spend our time analyzing this country from a racial lens, understood that the racial reckoning would not last long because the American attention span to injustice is always fleeting. 

We also knew an intense backlash was sure to follow. So, I tried with my writing and my voice to push us as far towards transformation as possible, understanding the short window we had. That was my obligation. But in trying to fulfill that obligation, the reckoning also asked me to open myself up to an intensity of personal attack and efforts to discredit my work that I had never known. In that period, I saw how alone you can be in doing this work once it becomes unpopular. In every way, the so-called racial reckoning of 2020 was a time of clarity. 

What did the racial reckoning of 2020 give back five years later? It gave back everything. The allies who marched in the street for racial justice have gone largely silent, and companies have abandoned their efforts. Black people striving for equality have been blamed for the electoral choices of White voters. People are being killed by the police in higher numbers than they were when George Floyd was murdered. And a significant segment of the media has abetted the backlash. Things have reverted so fiercely that the racial reckoning feels like it was but a dream because we are most certainly now living in a nightmare.

Joy-Ann Reid, host and commentator

The uprisings that spread across the [United States] five years ago despite the pandemic were passionate and multiracial. Even the fires and the damage were quickly revealed to be both rare and often caused by right-wing interlopers. Minneapolis-based Target led a veritable corporate parade of embracing Black Lives Matter, Black people, Black executives, Black small businesses and Black customers. We watched as at long last, military bases named inconceivably for Confederate traitors were renamed. Even the face of American leadership and justice changed, as a new president, Joe Biden, brought powerful Black women with him, including Vice President Kamala Harris and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. 

Still, I honestly was shocked when former officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of killing Mr. Floyd. But it felt like a new wind was blowing in America. 

But like everything in this country, the wind shifted back quickly. Trump defeated Harris to become president again. The Justice Department has ended all federal intervention against violent police departments. Trump’s wholly unqualified defense secretary moved to change the names back. 

The violent insurrection of January 6, 2021, has been certified as patriotic and pardon-worthy by Trump and his party. And our democracy itself is being dismantled around us, by men and women whose apparent true religion is hating diversity, equity and inclusion. What I’ve learned about America five years after George Floyd’s public lynching on that ordinary street in Minneapolis is what I already knew: that this country changes only with vicious reluctance, and that it shows no greater passion than when it changes back.

Karine Jean-Pierre, former White House press secretary

As a Black woman, I wasn’t newly awakened in 2020 — I was already living the reality the world was suddenly recognizing. What that moment did ask of me was to hold space for others’ awakening, to carry even more weight in naming and resisting the structures harming us, all while navigating my own grief and exhaustion. It demanded visibility, labor and vulnerability — often without adequate care or reciprocity.

And yet, five years later, I sit with the weight of this anniversary and ask: Are we worse off now than we were then? In many ways, yes. The initial wave of momentum — the commitments, the DEI initiatives, the promises of transformation — are being undone or abandoned. We’re seeing backlash codified into policy, historical truths banned from classrooms, and the language of equity distorted and weaponized. This isn’t fatigue — it’s systemic resistance. And as we look around today, it’s hard not to feel that we are going backwards.

But that doesn’t erase what the reckoning gave us: sharper clarity, deeper solidarity and a refusal to be gaslit. It taught me that the work we do — whether seen or unseen — is sacred and ongoing. I’m reminded of the words of Maya Angelou: “We may encounter many defeats but we must not be defeated.” The system may try to undo the progress, but our presence, our resistance and our vision for justice endure.

Janai Nelson, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund 

The 2020 racial reckoning dared Black people to suspend a cynicism born from centuries of betrayal in guarded hope that America might do better. Five years later, it’s been reconfirmed that this country remains gripped by a deep-seated and irrational fear of equality and justice and has yet to learn the hard lesson of linked fate. 

Nonetheless, we are somehow stronger for it. We have more converts to fight for racial justice. More clarity about who are our foes. And more resilience to withstand the battles ahead knowing that we who believe in freedom are growing in number with a generation that witnessed a radical reckoning that we can’t unsee. 

Karen Finney, Democratic consultant

It asked everything. And what it gave back is the unwavering understanding that we must continue — not because the system is changing, but because we are still here — and we refuse to be erased.

I just couldn’t sit through one more conversation where someone tried to soothe the nation with the same old platitudes — “This isn’t who we are.”

No.

This is who we are.

But it’s not who we have to be. 

The truth was undeniable — especially in the midst of a global pandemic that was already exposing the deep, layered inequities in how different communities were being impacted.

In polling and focus group work that summer, even disparate groups — like infrequent Black voters and White suburban women who leaned Republican — agreed: There was an urgent need for criminal justice and policing reforms. Even many in the political establishment — largely run by White consultants who usually advise candidates to avoid talking about race — had to acknowledge that silence was no longer an option. 

What that moment required of me was to show up — fully, boldly, unapologetically — as a Black woman in politics. I was called into and embraced by a circle of Black women where I could breathe, cry and strategize. We lifted each other up. We worked to amplify our sister-leaders and push forward a national conversation about the need for leaders who bring a different lived experience.

MAGA Republicans are back in the White House, and Project 2025 is their guide—the right-wing plan to turn back the clock on women’s rights, remove abortion access, and force women into roles as wives and mothers in the “ideal, natural family structure.” We know an empowered female electorate is essential to democracy. That’s why day after day, we stay vigilant in our goals to dismantle patriarchy at every turn. We are watching, and we refuse to go back. This is the War on Women Report.

Since our last report…

+ Some good news out of North Carolina: After a six-month legal battle, Republican Jefferson Griffin has finally conceded the North Carolina Supreme Court race to Democrat Allison Riggs. Riggs won the election in November, but Griffin refused to acknowledge his loss, attempting to challenge the election results by claiming tens of thousands of ballots were invalid.

+ The FDA approved the first at-home alternative for Pap smears. The wand-like device, created by Teal Health, will allow women to screen for cervical cancer and HPV without having to visit a doctor, simplifying the testing process and making it less painful by using a swab rather than a metal speculum.  

+ Maine has made progress toward enacting a law that would allow doctors to withhold their names from abortion medication bottles. The bill would protect providers of mifepristone and misoprostol from harassment and serve as a shield law by permitting doctors to print the names of their medical practices on prescription bottles rather than the names of individual doctors.

+ This month, the world learned of Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old Georgia woman who died in February from brain blood clots. Because she was pregnant, Georgia’s strict abortion laws require the hospital to keep her body on life support. “She’s been breathing through machines for more than 90 days. It’s torture,” said her mother, April Newkirk. The family is now burdened with mounting medical bills. Emory Midtown Hospital plans to keep Smith on life support until the fetus can survive outside the womb—even though doctors say it has severe brain damage and may not survive. “This decision should’ve been left to us,” Newkirk said.

In an emergency episode of On the Issues, host Michele Goodwin pointed to 13th Amendment concerns, likening Georgia’s actions to the historical reproductive servitude of Black women.

Let’s not forget what else was sent our way this month …

Monday, April 28: Ultra-Conservative Think Tank Publishes Faulty Report Claiming the Danger of Abortion Pills

The report, simply titled “The Abortion Pill Harms Women,” features several false claims regarding the safety of these medications. The ‘research’ claims that over 10 percent of women experienced what they call “serious adverse effects” such as sepsis or hemorrhage following a mifepristone-induced abortion. Notably, the ‘study’ defined such an event as including a mere visit to the emergency room within 45 days of taking mifepristone, thus miscategorizing thousands of patients and skewing the data to favor antiabortion policy.

The report, published by the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), has since prompted concerns regarding the FDA’s approval of medications like mifepristone and misoprostol. Referring to the safety of abortion pills, FDA commissioner Marty Makary stated, “We can’t promise we’re not going to act on that data that we have not yet seen.”

The FDA first approved mifepristone in 2000, and as of 2023, medication abortions account for roughly two-thirds of abortions in the U.S. More than 100 studies have since proven the safety of abortion pills.

Thursday, May 8: Pope Leo XIV at Odds With U.S. Catholics on Reproductive Rights

Catholic cardinals elected the first American pope, Chicago-born Robert Francis Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV. Although the pope has posted criticisms of Trump and JD Vance on social media, he has strongly opposed abortion and expressed hesitancy over IVF, upheld the Catholic tradition that women cannot be ordained as priests or deacons, and stated that marriage is between a man and a woman, criticizing the “homosexual lifestyle” and “alternative families” in a speech to bishops in 2012.

Chris Wimbaush, interim president of Catholics for Choice, noted Pope Leo disagrees with the majority of U.S. Catholics on his antiabortion stance, and said, “The future of our church depends on greater inclusion and nuance on reproductive health decisions like abortion, contraception, and IVF.”

Friday, May 9: Rümeysa Öztürk, the Tufts Student Detained by ICE, Released From Detention on Bail

Öztürk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University, was arrested on March 25 and released May 9 following an order from a federal judge in Vermont, William K. Sessions III. The judge, who had previously expedited her hearing, had to issue a second order calling for her immediate release due to federal officials’ attempts to require her to wear an ankle monitor.

Although she was arrested outside her home in Somerville, Mass., she was held in an immigrant detention center in Louisiana for six weeks before her release. Sessions expressed concern for the state of free speech in the wake of Öztürk’s arrest, stating noncitizens “may now avoid exercising their First Amendment rights for fear of being whisked away to a detention center from their home.”

Monday, May 12: Louisiana Opens Second Case Against New York Dr. Margaret Carpenter Over Alleged Mailing of Abortion Pills

In February, Louisiana issued an extradition warrant for the arrest of Dr. Carpenter for allegedly ordering abortion pills to a woman in Louisiana via telehealth, violating the state’s near-total abortion ban. In response, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed legislation strengthening the state’s 2023 shield law seeking to protect providers like Dr. Carpenter from out-of-state litigation. 

This month, Louisiana is investigating a second case involving Carpenter, who was also fined for sending abortion pills to Texas. Attorney General Liz Murill alleges Dr. Carpenter was involved in prescribing abortion pills to a woman she claims was “20 weeks pregnant.” Murrill alleges, “after she gave birth [she] took the baby, wrapped it in a towel and threw it in a garbage can.”

Gov. Hochul has previously stated she would not sign an extradition request to send Carpenter to Louisiana for arrest. 

Saturday, May 17: Southern California Fertility Clinic Bombed in Attack on Repro Healthcare

Four people were injured and one was killed in a bombing attack on the American Reproductive Centers (ARC) Fertility Clinic in Palm Springs, Calif. Police believe the man killed—25-year-old California resident Guy Edward Bartkus—was also the perpetrator of the bombing. Bartkus posted alarming content online before the attack, including videos of him testing the explosives and expressions of his “misandrist” beliefs.

“Basically, I’m anti-life,” he said in one recording that LAist cited, “and IVF is like kind of the epitome of pro-life ideology.”

Although staged on a fertility clinic, this attack is reminiscent of the last few years’ surge in violent attacks on abortion clinics and other reproductive healthcare facilities. IVF—which Bartkus cited in his attack on the Palm Springs clinic—is a target for many antiabortion extremists. Although IVF facilities have not faced as many attacks as other kinds of reproductive health clinics, they have seen a rise in protestors by so-called abortion and IVF “abolitionists.”

Monday, May 19: Texas Woman Kept in Jail for Five Months for a Miscarriage

Texas has finally dropped charges against Mallori Patrice Strait, a 34-year-old woman arrested on Dec. 19, 2024, for “abuse of a corpse” after she miscarried in a public restroom. Although prosecutors dropped the case for insufficient evidence, she was in prison for five months after a judge set her bail at $100,000. While she was in prison, a local crisis pregnancy center (CPC) took custody of the fetal remains, named the fetus and held a public funeral.

The Bexar County Medical Examiner determined that Strait had miscarried and her fetus died naturally, while the district attorney’s office stated there was no evidence that Strait tried to flush the fetus down the toilet despite sensationalist headlines claiming that she tried to flush her “baby girl” down the toilet and news websites publishing her mugshot.

Strait’s case is eerily similar to that of Brittany Watts, the woman in Ohio who sued the state in January after she lost her pregnancy at home and was arrested for “abuse of a corpse” despite suffering from a natural miscarriage. As with Strait, the media exaggerated and sensationalized Watts’ case with melodramatic headlines.

“Texas arrested [Strait] for a miscarriage, jailed her for nearly half a year, let an anti-abortion group name and bury her fetus—and then quietly dropped the charges once they realized they never had a case to begin with,” Jessica Valenti wrote. Regarding Strait’s and Watts’ cases, she also explained, “The people criminalized for their pregnancy outcomes tend to be marginalized—they’re often women of color, low income, immigrants, unhoused, or have substance abuse issues. Black women, in particular, are targeted by law enforcement and hospital staff.”

Wednesday, May 21: Judge Blocks Abortion Leave for Workers

A judge struck down federal regulations that required U.S. employers to give workers paid time off for abortions. The ruling from U.S. District Judge David Joseph comes despite existing guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which includes abortion among the pregnancy-related medical conditions covered by the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act of December 2022.

Thursday, May 22: Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” Passed in the House

The budget reconciliation bill passed in a 215-214 vote by House Republicans, threatening severe funding cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, along with implementing $5 trillion in tax reductions while removing aid for farmers. 

The bill would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by roughly $300 billion, which is bound to impact over 42 million Americans who depend on the nation’s largest food assistance program if it passes in the Senate.

MAZON, a Jewish nonprofit organization fighting hunger, along with the Electronic Privacy Information Center, is suing the Department of Agriculture following its demands that states submit SNAP recipients’ personal information to the USDA in order to receive aid. In the complaint, attorney Daniel Zibel stated that the suit intends “to ensure that the government is not exploiting our most vulnerable citizens by disregarding longstanding privacy protections.”

Tuesday, May 27: Extreme Texas Abortion Pill Bill Fails to Advance

To the relief of reproductive rights advocates across the country, Texas’ bill SB 2880 has died in the state legislature. The sweeping antiabortion bill would have targeted anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails or otherwise provides abortion medication in the state of Texas.

It would have also allowed private citizens to sue anyone helping someone obtain an abortion—even out of state—for a minimum of $100,000. This meant that a mother paying for a plane ticket for her daughter to fly to another state for an abortion, or a friend offering childcare while a mother in need of an abortion travels out of state, could have faced lawsuits and prison sentences.

In April, the bill passed Texas’ Republican-led Senate, and received approval from a House committee last week; however, the bill did not make it to the governor’s desk before the legislative session ended this week.

Back in April, before the senate passed SB 2880, Republican Sen. Bryan Hughes, the bill’s sponsor, insisted that the bill wouldn’t amount to a travel restriction on pregnant women. But Houston Democrat Sen. Molly Cook said, “We don’t believe you that this isn’t a travel ban and there is nothing in this bill that says you won’t be prosecuted for leaving the state.”

Meanwhile, Drexel law professor David S. Cohen, co-author of After Dobbs: How the Supreme Court Ended Roe but Not Abortion, highlighted how SB 2880 centered around trying to stop the spread of abortion pills and telehealth abortion medication. (About one in five abortions in the U.S. are now done through telehealth.) “The antiabortion movement knows if they want to stop abortion in the future, they have to stop pills, but historically, that’s a hard thing to do,” he said. “It’s a hard thing to do to stop a drug. That’s partly why the antiabortion movement is flailing.”

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Ameca, a humanoid robot, smiled and blinked at the crowd at Dubai AI Week 2025, a celebration of all things artificial intelligence. Landmark announcements marked the event, including a $545 million hyperscale data center to supply Microsoft and Dubai’s first PhD program in AI. 

AI engineer Nair, 29, felt inspired. Since moving to the United Arab Emirates last October from Kerala, India, she had applied to hundreds of entry-level jobs and faced rejections, scams and exploitative offers. Rest of World is not revealing her first name to protect her identity.

Now she remembered why she’d emigrated. “Dubai is emerging as a global AI hub,” she told Rest of World. “It was fascinating to see how companies are pushing the boundaries of what’s possible.”

Tech workers like Nair are moving to the UAE, attracted by a Golden Visa program that gives 10 years of residency to skilled professionals, no taxes, high salaries and the ease of setting up business, recruiters and tech professionals told Rest of World. 

“The UAE ranks second only to the U.S. in attracting top AI talent, with many of these experts now calling the UAE home,” Abdulla bin Touq Al Marri, UAE’s Minister of Economy, said last year.

The UAE has positioned itself as the U.S.’ tech ally.  During President Donald Trump’s recent visit, it secured access to 500,000 of the most advanced Nvidia chips, critical for AI development. It also announced plans to build the largest AI campus outside the U.S. in collaboration with American tech companies. And last year, Microsoft and Emirati AI firm G42 announced they are working together to create a “skilled and diverse AI workforce.” 

The UAE’s laser-sharp focus on AI makes it attractive for tech workers at a time when opportunities are shrinking in the West. More than 50,000 tech workers, mostly mid-level managers and developers, have been laid off in the U.S. this year from about 100 companies, according to the layoff tracker Layoffs.fyi. There are also fewer openings for roles such as software developers, and many tech workers fear the Trump government’s stringent immigration policies. Venture capital investment in startups, too, has cooled in the West. 

But beneath the UAE’s sheen of opportunity, the job market can pose challenges for tech workers depending on where they’re from, workers and recruiters told Rest of World. Senior tech talent from the West are often headhunted for top positions at high salaries. Experienced AI experts from South Asia and Ukraine fill the lower ranks, for lower pay. 

And young talent like Nair fall in a gray area of AI professionals who struggle to get hired. With a Master’s in electronics engineering and specialization in AI hardware from an Indian college and one year of work experience, she has been job-hunting for months.

“You get automatic rejections,” she told Rest of World. “Companies want candidates with four to five years of experience for entry-level roles, or they hire through referrals.”

This is not due to a dearth of jobs. Dubai has more than 800 AI firms, most of them startups, according to the Dubai Center for Artificial Intelligence. Abu Dhabi has over 400 AI companies. Most of them plan to recruit this year. 

But the UAE also has an “abundance” of tech workers, according to a 2024 talent report by the UAE Ministry of Economy and immigration law firm Fragomen. Most of these workers are not qualified for specialized AI roles, the report said. 

About 95% of 50,000 companies surveyed in the report said they hired tech professionals from outside the Middle East. 

“There’s not enough domestic university talent so we recruit candidates from India and Ukraine,” Vahid Haghzare, director of SVA Recruitment based in Dubai, told Rest of World.

The UAE is a “global migration node,” Froilan Malit Jr., a visiting scholar at American University in Dubai and an expert on migration to the Middle East, told Rest of World. It is a transit space for people from developing countries to gain experience before moving West, while Western professionals can leverage their expertise for higher pay and long-term residency in the UAE, he said. 

Western professionals are attracted by Dubai’s lifestyle perks, while Asian and Muslim tech workers appreciate a culture that’s a mix of East and West, Malit Jr. said. “It’s a win-win: tax-free income, top schools, security, and cosmopolitan living.”

Workers get different salaries based on their years of experience, and also where they are from, he said. Workers from developing nations experience a “citizenship penalty” and command a lower salary in the UAE than their western counterparts, Malit Jr. said. 

“That’s what triggers a lot of tech workers from the Global South to move to the West, and then return [to the UAE] with a new passport,” he said.

Jarkko Moilanen, head of data products at the Abu Dhabi Department for Government Enablement, which oversees the city’s digital transformation, moved to the UAE in 2022 from Finland after being recruited as one of 200 global experts to help drive the effort.  

“I needed a change,” said the 50-year-old AI professional, who has helmed transformations at various tech companies in Finland. A year later, he decided to stay long-term in the UAE and applied for a Golden Visa.

The nation has made relocation relatively frictionless, especially for AI-related specialists, developers and entrepreneurs. Dubai had issued an estimated 158,000 Golden Visas by 2023.

Moilanen said that he is incentivized to stay in the UAE rather than go back to Europe, which he perceives as being in economic decline. In contrast, Abu Dhabi has gone all in on AI, and plans to become the world’s first AI-native government, laying the groundwork to fully automate and digitize government processes.

Moilanen said that he has also received multiple job offers from recruiters in Saudi Arabia, but has turned them down as he hopes to launch an AI and data business in the UAE.

“The data and AI combination here is hot. They have the money to execute fast,” he said.

AI startups are thriving in the UAE, with support from funds like Hub71, an Abu Dhabi-based incubator. In Dubai, Sandbox, funded by Oraseya Capital, supports existing startups, while the Dubai Future Accelerators helps companies collaborate with the government. 

Entrepreneur Nidhima Kohli, originally from Luxembourg, recently launched her startup, The AI Accelerator, an online course meant to help entrepreneurs and executives use AI tools to improve productivity.  She migrated to Dubai in 2022 and received a Golden Visa the following year. 

“I’ve lived in London, Paris, and the U.S., but never felt as safe as in Dubai. It is international, people are approachable and happy to connect with you,” she told Rest of World. 

She said she appreciates the ease of networking and setting up a business in the UAE. “The UAE is putting money where its mouth is. They want to grow and not stifle innovation.”

But for less experienced workers from South Asia, like Nair, hurdles persist. She has seen many scam jobs on LinkedIn, including a recruiter who asked her to pay $1,000 for a certification course. She has also received exploitative offers. One company offered her 3,000 dirhams ($816) per month, much below market rate. Another asked her to work seven days a week, without paid leave or sick days. 

Despite all the setbacks, Nair remains hopeful for the road ahead. “I’m excited about the opportunities to grow, learn, and make a meaningful impact here.”

Sam Stein is joined by Greta Peisch, former General Counsel for the U.S. Trade Representative, to explain the latest legal developments in Trump’s tariff policies, including a court ruling challenging his use of emergency powers to impose broad trade restrictions, and how the ongoing legal uncertainty could affect future negotiations.

Leave a comment

As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members.

Don’t care for video? Use the controls on the left side of the player to toggle to audio.

Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here.

Sam Stein and Will Saletan discuss Trump’s $20 billion demand in lawsuit against CBS over 60 Minutes’ interview edit of Kamala Harris, and the bizarre legal claims and plaintiffs behind it.

Leave a comment

As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members.

Don’t care for video? Use the controls on the left side of the player to toggle to audio.

Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here.

Former podcast host turned Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino publicly melted down on Fox, overwhelmed by the reality of investigative work. Unable to prove his MAGA conspiracy theories, he’s facing backlash from supporters.

Leave a comment

As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members.

Don’t care for video? Use the controls on the left side of the player to toggle to audio.

Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here.

Sam Stein sits down with NOTUS reporter Margaret Manto to break down RFK Jr.’s MAHA report—a document packed with fake citations, broken links, and bogus studies.

Leave a comment

As always: Watch, listen, and leave a comment. Bulwark+ Takes is home to short videos, livestreams, and event archives exclusively for Bulwark+ members.

Don’t care for video? Use the controls on the left side of the player to toggle to audio.

Add Bulwark+ Takes feed to your player of choice, here.

Elon Musk isn’t very pleased with the “big, beautiful” budget the House passed before leaving town at the end of last week. He’s admitted to being disappointed with the legislation and has warned that it would harm critical subsidies for electric vehicles and solar projects. He’s also called it antithetical to the DOGE mission he has spearheaded at the behest of Donald Trump.

In all, it’s created a completely unexpected—and frankly, almost unthinkable—specter: the Republican party’s top donor, the president’s once-top adviser, publicly ragging on the biggest piece of legislation that the administration and its allies have attempted to push during their time in office.

Few opportunities like this have ever existed for an opposition party. And yet, in the 48 hours since Musk let his dissatisfaction be known, Democrats don’t appear to be doing much at all to capitalize on it.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries hasn’t posted on X, Facebook, or Instagram about Musk’s comments. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s opportunism extended to a single post about it on Facebook and X: “Wow, I didn’t realize Trump was even allowed to break with President Musk.” The Democratic National Committee’s rapid response account on X, “@Factpostnews,” posted about Musk’s comments twice. No formal statement was issued by any of their offices. Nor have other leader members of Congress jumped on Musk’s criticisms in any meaningful way.